Entries Tagged as 'social studies'

Using Historical Fiction Picture Books Part Two

December 7, 2011 · 1 Comment · Common Core Standards, Disciplinary Literacy, history, learning, literacy, Literacy in Social Studies, Picture, Picture Books, reading, Reading and Writing Enrichment, Reading Comprehension, reflecting, social studies

In the Article “Comprehension Strategies for Reading Historical Fiction Picturebooks” by Suzette Youngs and Frank Serafini in The Reading Teacher, October 2011 the authors offer suggestions for moving readers from the literal details to the interpretive assertions.  Yesterdays post focused on the considerations for using historical fiction picture books.

I think consideration must be given to teaching the teacher before teaching students from the transition from literal to interpretive assertions.  To a certain degree the teacher must own the content or have a clear understanding of the content before moving further.  With inquiring minds of all ages (teacher included) we hope the multimodal text will plant a seed in the learners head to inquire further. At the completion of the reading- pre, during, and post- I would hope the book would help the reader form an emotional attachment with the book. The article by Youngs and Serafini offers three strategies:

 

Phase I: Previewing, Noticing, and Naming

As readers approach a picturebook, we encourage them to focus on these elements or thoughts>

  • What visual and design features do you notice?
  • How do the visual, textual, and design modes relate to one another?
  • What did the illustrator, author, and publisher include in the peritext?
  • What type of historical fiction might this be?
  • Focus attention to Historical fiction as a Genre. Are they aware of different examples of historical fiction? I suggest keeping a chart somewhere in your room of different historical fiction books you have read and be able to talk about what they notice in the differences.
    • o   fictionalized memoirs
    • o   fictionalized family histories and stories
    • o   fiction based on research
  •  Essential Questions to Ask When Reading Historical Fiction
    • ·         Is this true? How much is this true?
    • ·         How can we distinguish between fact from fiction?
    • ·         How do the authors know?
    • ·         How much of it happened like this?
    • ·         How can the auto rote help to construct meaning?
    • ·         What type of historic fiction is this?
    • ·         How do the illustration and the text work together?
  • Attention to Visual and Textual Elements
    • ·         What did you notice about the cover, back cover, title page, end pages.
    • ·         What did you notice visual and design elements of the picturebook”
    • ·         By allowing readers to determine what is important by focusing on what they notice, teachers can shift the focus of the discussion to what matters to their readers. (Youngs, 2011)
  • During this first read-aloud, we take note of the balance between narrative and factual elements, how color is used throughout the text to suggest moods and themes, how characters are portrayed in the written text and images, how the story unfolds and how it makes us feel, and other narrative features such as setting, character, plot, and resolution. By focusing readers’ attention on the visual, textual, and design elements of the picturebook, we establish a foundation for readers to move from attending to the visual and verbal features of a picturebook to the interpretation of these elements. (Youngs, 2011)

Phase II: Moving Beyond Noticing to Interpretation

  • Read the book a second time!
  • Invite readers to consider the meaning potential of various visual and textual elements embedded within the picturebook and how these individual elements contribute to the story as a whole.
  • Help the learners pay attention the one telling the story and their perspective.
  • Help the learners pay attention to how the image is framed, the setting of the image or illustration. Framing is a way illustrators invite viewers into an image or distance them from what is being presented.
  • Character-reader relationship- A technique that illustrators use to develop a relationship between the character and viewer is called demand and offer. When a character in an image or illustration makes direct contact with the viewer, this is called demand and when a character looks at other characters or objects within the image, it is called an offer. (Youngs, 2011, p. 120) Demand offers the reader an interactive role and demands the attention of the reader where as an offer does not bring the reader into a direct relationship with the character. Rather these scenes and actions serve as information for the reader to consider. The author and illustrator works together to create a relationship between the reader and the characters and events in the story. (Youngs, 2011, pp. 120-121) This is an important position to consider in the genre of historical fiction.

Phase III: Moving Beyond Interpretation to Critical Analysis

What happens in the phase depends on the background knowledge readers bring to the text and the intention of the books use in the content area. Let me point out whether one is using historical fiction or another type of fiction the three phases need to be taught along the continuum of early and intermediate literacy stages. The more background knowledge learners have prior to reading the picture book, will help them assume a critical stance.  This path must be modeled and taught.  The path is a forward movement from early literacy to intermediate literacy and the higher level would be disciplinary literacy.  Important considerations include:

  • Many historical fiction picture book illustrators draw on cultural, political, and social symbols to make inter-textual connections within the illustrations and to other visual images. (Youngs, 2011)
  • Here are some open ended questions that will promote this type of thinking”
    • o   Whose view of history is being presented in the book?
    • o    How are historical characters portrayed?
    • o   What systems of power and social issues are being challenged?
    • o   Whose view is privileged in the telling of the story?
    • o   What has been left out of the story?
    • o   How do the images presented affect the readers’ interpretations?
  • Visual Symbol Analysis: “Illustrators of historical fiction picturebooks often embed historical images within their illustrations. Analysis of these images requires readers to construct an image as a historical symbol, to place the image within its original historical context, and to make intertextual connections between the book being read and the embedded image. Anstey and Bull (2006) referred to the use of intertextuality and described it as “the ways one text might draw on or resemble the characteristics of another causing the consumer of the text to make links between them” (p. 30).” (Youngs, 2011, pp. 121-122)
  • Placement of Characters within an Illustration- How the character is placed in the illustration carries additional meaning to the whole text. It tells us lots about the characters social standing and power structures with other characters. Characters placed at the top of the image are given higher social status or power compared to those place near the bottom of the pictures. Characters placed side by side might be entering into an adventure  (Youngs, 2011, pp. 122-123). Other questions to consider:
    • o   What might the spatial relationship suggest?  (Youngs, 2011, pp. 122-123) How might we interpret the placement of characters or objects on the page and throughout the book?  (Youngs, 2011, pp. 122-123) Who or what is privileged in the various images?  (Youngs, 2011, pp. 122-123)
    • o   What systems of power are represented? (Youngs, 2011, pp. 122-123) (We must teach learners to take a critical stance of various images and symbols represented in historical fiction picture books) (Youngs, 2011, p. 122)

These strategies presented by Youngs and Serefini need to be considered as we prepare our learners for the real world. This framework can better prepare teachers for using historical fiction or any fictional picture book in the content curriculum.  It serves as a guide, but should help to focus on the teacher how picture book could be possibly used. I think it is important the teacher understand the framework so that parts as necessary can be modeled and taught to all learners.

Bibliography

Piercy, T. a. (2011). Disciplinary Literacyq. Englewood, Colorada: Lead and Learn Press.

Youngs, S. a. (2011). Comprehension Strategies for Reading Historical Fiction Picture Book. The Reading Teacher , 115-124.

[Read more →]

Moving toward a literacy action model- social studies

December 4, 2011 · 4 Comments · 21st Century Literacies, Disciplinary Literacy, Literacy in Social Studies, social studies

Literacy in Action: 

In my November 3 post I wrote about the continuous raw data that flows through Twitter, Facebook, Google Plus, forums, and other social media tools. When we look at the data, we have to put in place filters to understand the information that is being presented.  As we look at the data being presented, we have to think a different way in order to understand the message that is being communicated.

Teaching social studies today is a literacy act that expands greater than a lecture and watching a PowerPoint Presentation.  We can’t just capture the imagination of the learners in the classroom by just telling stories and saying we taught a social studies or history lesson.  The lessons from social studies go beyond collecting names, dates, and summaries of important historical events. Today this information in history is a click away.  Those born in this century and those who have embraced digital and social media are leaving specific footprints that can be studies by professional and amateur historian for decades and centuries to come.  We will leave behind a legacy of detailed life events of thoughts, opinions, and timelines of life’s events.

As we teach kids about social media we have to embrace the idea that we are all capable of being amateur journalist. Since we have that capacity, we must rethink the purpose of social studies instruction. Social Studies must transcend itself to an action model- literacy in action model of learning social studies. The focus of instruction should be to teach kids how to think critically about the past and the present events that unfold very quickly through social media, television, and/or other media. We live in a world that we each have the ability to write and contribute raw data that will make be used to assess events.  Today’s youth learn about world and local events through social media unlike the people from the past century who depended on television, newspaper, and radio.

For example, we have a free encyclopedia that is researched, written, cited, revised, and edited by the people of the world. Wikipedia has transformed how information is shared and transformed how a crowd of people who care contribute to an accurate history of the world. Everyone can contribute. Everyone can add an article as long as it meets a certain criteria.  And if doesn’t meet the criteria and is found not to be accurate, the people will come along and fix or they delete. Wikipedia is no fly by night encyclopedia. It must be taken serious by academia. It works because the people feel compelled to participate for the common good of society.  The people who offer their service to Wikipedia know how to apply filters to make sure what is being shared is most accurate. There job is not to convince other that an event, person, or place really happened but report the work accurately without biased. This means we all can be amateur historians and contribute to the common good to help with the betterment of society.

We must think in terms of transforming our instruction to meet the changes in our economy, global society which we live, the participatory society which we live, and the change roles of jobs and the work place in our world. The teaching of social studies must resemble a literacy in action model. History and social studies is a discipline of inquiry and analysis. “Doing History” is an active process of asking good question about the past and the present, finding and analyzing sources, and drawing conclusions supported by the evidence. And “doing history/social studies” is a literacy process.

 

“Doing history/social studies” requires literacy skills beyond the basic and the intermediate literacy stage.  Social Student by the sixth grade should begin applying disciplinary literacy skills in order to apply disciplinary literacy. Doing history requires learner to apply filters to people, events, and places in history to draw inferences. “The familiar past entices us with the promise that we can locate our own place in the stream of time and solidify our identity in the present. By tying our own stories to those who have come before us, the past becomes a useful resource in our everyday life, an endless storehouse of raw materials to be shaped or bent to our present needs.” (Piercy, 2011, p. 77) We have been told that history is a large body of indisputable facts about people, places, laws, wars, events, and dates (Mandell, 2007)

“Doing history/social studies” requires a literacy action. We must question what historians look for in a text, the information they seek to filter, and how they use what they infer/discover to share with an audience.  They use this to build an historical interpretation. Piercy and Piercy offers a Four-Stage Model of Text Investigation as medium of filtering. The model includes these four levels: context, text, and two subtexts: impersonal and personal.

First, historian view acts of writing as acts of speaking. In this writing (this blog post), contains my voice and it is my “speech act” in terms of text in this digital space.  My speech act is my communication- my voice and my thoughts and experiences and everything else that has affected my thinking. What I say here affects how you view the text. The context of my writing affects how you view the text. My voice in my writing may help you ignore how horribly I write and ignore the grammatical errors I seem to frequently make.

In other words, the context in this writing is based on me as an individual that includes what I know, think, and believe, what I am learning, how I view things, my personal biases, persuasive language and my experiences in life. The text is the speech act, the word on the page. Therefore, whatever you know about me affects how you view the text on the page and you will adapt your response accordingly.

Subtext- Impersonal and Personal: This writing was produced by me to fulfill a certain purpose or plan (impersonal subtext). Whether I accomplished that or not depends on what you think my personal motives and intentions include (personal subtext) and the personal subtext will have an effect on what you take away from reading this post.

We must take another look at the importance of social studies and how the understanding of literacy fits not only in pedagogical practices but a part of the teaching content. History/Social Studies is an action model of learning.

 

[Read more →]

Tags: ··

Thinking about teaching with primary sources

November 1, 2011 · 3 Comments · 21st Century, Literacy in Social Studies, social studies

Speaking of primary sources such as images- it is important to have access to important picture clues and activate prior knowledge. A primary source helps unfold the story and leads the curious mind to the story. When teaching young and older learners, primary sources can provide the hook into learning. It serves at the possibility of activating prior knowledge and building curiosity. As we know children need to talk about real things, describing and elaborating on real things. Primary sources intrigues us as some level but can serve as a catalyst to enlightened the learner’s curiosity.

Primary sources serve as hooks to the learning process. The can help the mind to associate with an event, idea, or person in history.

Primary sources can be the key to making the basics of critical thinking—asking questions, seeking answers, and drawing conclusions—central to teaching. Primary sources are the stuff of life—what we do, say, perform, sing, make, and create—that we categorize, study, and analyze through the lenses of the humanities, the sciences, folklife, and the arts. Primary sources are the things that intrigue us that pushes us to ask questions, seek answers, and draw conclusion. Primary sources are the raw material that both scientist and historian study to make sense of life.

To use primary sources most effectively, educators must ask questions that will prompt students to draw from their own experiences and knowledge, to explore and think about what is before them.

As I reflect back on the learning activity with my Teaching American History Grant teachers, The Charleston Archival Challenge, we could provide opportunities for our students in our classrooms similar to what they experienced. Themes sets of primary sources can be put together in file folders with an essential question attached to the front of the folder. Participants have opportunities to read, write, think, discuss, and present their knowledge to a larger audience.

In our student classrooms we can provide opportunities for similar research by grouping themed topics for small group collaboration. We have to find ways to give kids the opportunity to indulge their curiosity, ask some questions, and find some answers. Mini research projects lend themselves to larger projects. What my teachers experienced during the challenge them and engage them without overwhelming them.

[Read more →]

Tags: ·

Charleston Archival Challenge (part 3)

October 12, 2011 · 1 Comment · Miscellaneous, social studies, TAH

March 2, 201   I wrote a  post about the first Archival Challenge with another group of teachers. Both group of teachers have taught me so much.  As part of my reflection, here is a letter to the teachers about the day.  I solicit your thoughts as well.

Part One

Part Two
Dear Teachers,

I hoped Saturday was as much fun for you as it was for me. I had fun watching you learn.  I watched how you shifted from being motivated extrinsically by the challenge (plus being a requirement for a graduate course) to watching how your intrinsic motivations took over. Your own curiosity took over.

I hope you have had time to internalize the whole process Saturday.  The whole day we focused on you as a learner.  You engaged in real research using primary sources and secondary sources. We made the hard part easy for you by gathering the resources at the archives.  I enjoyed listening to your conversations as you worked. I noticed the many inferences and conclusions that you drew. I heard you formulate new questions and watched you search for the answers. I noticed that many times you came up empty handed with an answer to the question, but I saw that your search led to new question. The learning that was happening was natural.

Then I watched each of you as you presented your information.  You were able to show how you had internalized what you researched. You simply did not just read the content on the PowerPoint slide, but you gave so much more. You reflected deeply on what you had learned and you proved that in your presentation.

Your discussion in the presentation showed what you really learned. You had time in your groups to read, thinks, and share with each other and collaboratively you constructed new knowledge for yourself and the audience.

A few weeks ago I asked you to Google “primary source” and I shared that Wikipedia has a really good article on the topic.  Drayton Hall taught about how we can learn about Drayton past from archeological digs and yesterday we had the opportunity to work with images, documents, letters, newspapers, etc.- to learn about Charleston’s past. I watched how primary sources raised your curiosity. It drove you to inquire deeper into the topic.

I told each of you from the beginning of our journey together that we would focus first on each of you being a learner.  I am reminded of a quote from the late Donald Graves stated, “the teacher has to be the primary learner in the classroom.” As the number one learner in your classroom, how can we make learning look like what we experienced Saturday? How can we help kids scaffold research using primary and secondary sources in our classrooms?

Learn about the Storyline Process and Scottish Storyline.

 

[Read more →]

Tags: ····

Planning a Presentation

August 7, 2010 · 1 Comment · collaboration, learning, Planning, social studies

Dear Readers,

Two weeks ago I was asked to give  a presentation to K-5 teachers on effective small group strategies in a social studies classrooms.  For two weeks now, I have not put serious thought into my planning,, but what I do know each principal from 19 elementary school are sending at least one person to this workshop.  I was told the workshop needed to focus on differentiated instruction for a homogeneous classroom.  This past Wednesday mind started churning and then my mind whizzed once I saw that 30 people, the maximum capacity for the worskshop, and ten on a waiting list have registered in ERO for this Friday, August 13.

I spent Friday, all day, doing things around the house. Our district office is closed on Fridays during the summer.  About 6 P.M yesterday, I sat down for three hours and put some serious thought into the presentation. I have created a wiki page to share my handouts and resources.  Please talk a look at this page (and I would love feed back).  I have working on a slide presentation that I will post later in the weekend. I am still hammering that out in my head.

At this moment in time I plan to focus this two hour workshop on three areas:

  1. Planning for instruction- focus on the learner, what students need to know, what they need to understand, what they will do. I will go further in the discussion to include Multiple Intelligences, Interest, learning modalities, etc.
  2. Three essential factors to a good social studies lesson- historical thinking, historical literature, and student engagement
  3. Focus on resources and strategies ( seen wiki pagefor resources and strategy handouts) I want to show how technology can be used as tool. (still in the planning stage)

Finally engage all the participants in the conversation. I am posting my rough draft presentation below. This will be in revision until Friday, AM.

If you have any suggestions, ideas, critiques, please share them…..

Bill

[Read more →]

Tags:

Why Does Geography Matter

May 24, 2010 · 1 Comment · 21st Century, learning, literacy, social studies

I found this video produced by Google employees here! The video features Google employees and students sharing their thoughts on why geography matters.

[Read more →]

Tags: ··

Teaching Social Studies- Part Two

March 6, 2010 · 1 Comment · 21st Century, history, social studies

Historical thinking is defined, according to Wikipedia,  by many education resources as a set of reasoning skills that students of history should learn as a result of studying history. Sometimes called historical reasoning skills, historical thinking skills are frequently described in contrast to history content such as names, dates, and places. Many of us are schooled in social studies, US History, and World History by taking notes, memorizing names, dates, and facts, and regurgitating it on some form a test. We may have been subjected to videos while the teacher graded a few papers, and the teacher called this teaching and learning. Most educators agree that together, history content–or facts about the past–and historical thinking skills enable students to interpret, analyze and use information about past events. In many cases historical thinking helps us understand and find meaning in present day events and future events.

21st century classrooms launches this type of thinking as early as Kindergarten. The use primary source items including artifacts, pictures, painting, images, and archive documents are prevalent in these classrooms across America. Students are encouraged and taught to think like historians to come to an understanding about the past. The United States Department of Education has established five benchmarks in grades K-4 and 5-12. This benchmarks are the following:

  1. Chronological Thinking
  2. Historical Comprehension
  3. Historical Analysis and Interpretation
  4. Historical Research Capabilities
  5. Historical Issues-Analysis and Decision-Making

These benchmarks serve as a guide of the type of instruction that should occur in social studies and history classroom across the United States. These benchmarks serve as a guide for educators  to teach students how to critically read primary sources and how to critique and construct historical narratives. The process of learning is based on the creation of knowledge by the learner.  It is more important that the teacher guide the students in seeing how history is documented and put into narrative format through text, video, or audio through the analysis of primary sources.  The emphasis is focused on the artifacts and first hand information that history was documented.

Students must be engaged in processes that they have to use the skills of an historian to analyze and synthesize information to produce knowledge. The process allows students to make informed conclusions about the past. Research using secondary sources including books (historical fiction and non-fiction), magazines, journals, and digital resources are used widely to help the learner to come to a historical understanding about the past. It is the same type of skills that are congruent to skills of the 21st century learner.

[Read more →]

Tags: ····

Nurturing the 21st Century History Teacher

March 5, 2010 · No Comments · 21st Century, history, professional development, social networking, social studies, Staff Development

Emerging technologies, a globalized world, and fiscal restraints demand innovative approaches to education. This K12 online Conference session explores new research about 21st century teaching strategies and professional development and shares models, resources, and examples to help social studies teachers effectively integrate technology and address needed skills. Join Tom Daccord in this presentation.


Visit National Council for the Social Studies

[Read more →]

Tags:

Teaching Social Studies in K-5- Thoughts about Guiding Principles

March 1, 2010 · 3 Comments · 21st Century, history, social studies

Social Studies is most important in the early years of an elementary child’s schooling. It is often the most neglected subject that is taught in the elementary grades. It ranks with less importance than Math and ELA, but offers the most natural link to fostering curiosity, learning, reading, and writing. It is the subject that is taught when there is time left in the day. It is the subject that the classroom teacher is less prepared to teach. Teachers are lucky to have had a college US History course and many have to rely on their knowledge from their high school days. It is the subject that most teachers depend on a text book that may be outdated or does not match their state’s current standards. It is the subject that teachers teach the way their teachers taught when they were in school.

This blog post will attempt to address the importance of doing history in elementary grades. Throughout this writing I will base my knowledge from the book titled National Standards for Social Studies published by National Center for History in Schools. The book was published in 1996 and it is very forward thinking with how social studies and US History instruction should be carried out in our schools. Also the writing is based on my observations and other reading in my 22 teaching career and the last six months observing and learning from 29 professional educators in their classrooms and in professional learning communities and networking with other Teaching American History Grant Directors across the United States.

According to Brian Cambourne’s Model of Learning, learners have to be immersed in all kinds of text or curricula activity that has been scaffold to meet their learning needs. It may be through demonstration, images, multimodal texts, sounds, video, artifacts, primary source, and more followed by engagement. This is followed by the learner’s creation of knowledge. Therefore, in helping the early learner, there are six guiding principles that teachers and school curricula people must conscious of in their buildings and classroom.

Guiding Principles for the Development of Standards for K-5

  1. Children should begin from kindergarten to build historical understandings and perspectives and to think historically. It is our responsibility in the early years to support the condition of fostering children’s natural curiosity and imagination. It is important to provide them opportunities to reach out in time and space, and expand their world of understanding far beyond their immediate world.  (Schools, p. 3) Young learners must struggle through and learn the world that must be shared with their peers and family members. So often young learners have not had to share their environment with such a broader community. I have witnessed more often the natural curiosity and imagination these learners bring to the classroom.  Their historical understanding begins by learning the social norms in a classroom environment. Most elementary teachers do this so naturally.
  2. Although young children are only in the early stages of acquiring concepts of chronology and time, they easily learn to differentiate time present, time past, and time “long, long ago”-skills on which good programs in historical thinking can then build over grades K-4. (Schools, 1996)
  3. Chronology, time, and space are difficult concepts but our K-5 student needs ample opportunities to engage in learning activities where they have to learn about order, time, and space. These opportunities occur often in stories they read or are told and when they have opportunities to create their own stories. It happens in play time. It happens when teaching biographies of people like Abe Lincoln, George Washington or Barrack Obama.
  4. To bring history alive, an important part of children’s historical studies should be centered in people-the history of families and of people, ordinary and extraordinary, who have lived in children’s own community, state, nation, and the world. (Schools, p. 3) Usually I begin my first writing workshop in the many years I taught in elementary grades by reading When I Was Young in the Mountains by Cynthia Rylant. In the same day we discuss how the text was written with that rhythm of the word When I was young… and the student spend a the first few days writing a poem about their life using Rylants book as a mentor text. It becomes their story about who they are and the history that surrounds their life. Teaching history has to begin with their life and that is what our standards do in South Carolina. It grows from self to the world we live in. Each year of study builds upon the learning that happens in more formal studies of history in later years.
  5. History becomes especially accessible and interesting to children when approached through stories, myths, legends, and biographies that capture children’s imaginations and immerse them in times and cultures of the recent and long-ago past. (Schools, p. 3) We have a wealth of authors who are writing historical fiction and writing non-fiction. These stories help learner get a perspective of history through a different point of view. Fiction and biographies helps the learner to build experiences vicariously. It helps them build relationships and make connections with people in of the ages.
  6. In addition to stories, children should be introduced to a wide variety of historical artifacts, illustrations, and records that open to them first-hand glimpses into the lives of people in the past: family photos; letters, diaries, digital media, and other accounts of the past obtained from family records, local newspapers, libraries, and museums; field trips to historical sites in their neighborhood and community; and visits to “living museums” where actors reenact life long ago. (Schools, p. 3)
  7. All these resources should be used imaginatively to help children formulate questions for study and to support historical thinking, such as the ability to marshal information; create sound hypotheses; locate events in time and place; compare and contrast past and present; explain historical causes and consequences; analyze historical fiction and illustrations for their accuracy and perspectives, and compare with primary sources that accurately portray life, attitudes, and values in the past; compare different stories about an era or event in the past and the interpretations or perspectives of each; and create historical narratives of their own in the form of stories, letters such as a child long ago might have written, and descriptive accounts of events. (Schools, p. 3) This is most important to understand how history is shared and retold.

I guess the big question should follow next. How should this play out in a classroom? What should it look like? I don’t hold the answers fully to these questions. Brian Cambourne’s seven conditions for learning must be played out.  The learning process begins where our children are in space, time, and their experiences. Most of what happens in early years builds a learning model for something great that happens in sequential years of their life- not their formal schooling life.  Just Having an historical understanding of rules in a classroom give way to later learning about behavior in school, church, society, events, etc.  Learning about the importance of the Statue of Liberty and engaging learners in the making of replica crown like Lady Liberty create mental models for future learning and discussion in first and upper grades. Because the teacher paved the road about this national symbol,  it will make it easier for new learning to occur when the Statue of Liberty comes up in historical fiction, a discussion in or out of school, lesson, etc. Students will now have a frame of reference.

When students are asked to compare old photographs of police offers from 1900 with photographs with police officers in 2010, it will give the historical perspective. Just the fact that on photograph is black and white could lead to further discussion about time, place, and space as it did with a second grader I observed yesterday. She thought how strange the old black and white photograph looked compared to the 2010 photo. It made her giggle. The teacher used the moment to teach. Obviously the learner came to a new understanding about the changes in past and present communities.

I use these conditions or basic principles as expand what I am learning about teaching and learning social studies.

Schools, N. C. (1996). National Standards for History. Los Angeles: National Center for Education in the Schools.

[Read more →]

Tags: ··

Interactive Minatures- Charles Fraser, Artist, 1780-1860,

February 28, 2010 · 2 Comments · history, Miscellaneous, social studies

billCharles Fraser (1782-1860) was a popular and respected artist from Charleston, SC. The leading miniaturist in Charleston prior to the Civil War, Fraser studied and practiced law until 1817 when he took up painting. Although he lived in Charleston, SC, he made many summer visits to the northern states.  He produced over 500 miniatures in his lifetime, but he also painted still lifes and historic scenes.  He worked in both oils and watercolors.

His works can be found in Charleston at the Gibbes Art Gallery.

You can learn about his style and technique at this interactive website at http://www.gibbesmuseum.org/explore/fraser_interactive/.  This great place to learn about art and history.

[Read more →]

Tags: ····